• Dutch
  • English
  • Vacancies
  • Client login
  • Bezuidenhoutseweg 101, The Hague
  • Avenue des Arts 39, Brussels
  • Nederlands Nederlands Dutch nl
  • English English English en
Public Matters
  • Home
  • Services
  • Sectors
  • People
  • About us
  • News
  • Vacancies
  • Contact
  • Client login
  • +31 (0) 70 304 6499
  • Direct mail
  • Nederlands
  • English
  • Menu
News

The Member State Effect

16-11-2021
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share by Mail

In the book The Brussels Effect, Anu Bradford well explains how EU regulation is transmitted to both market participants and regulators outside the EU. Take for example the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), which served as a model for countries like Korea and China. However, this ‘defining position’ is challenged by a fast-changing world. Developments in digitalization and green energy are of such a pace that the traditional way of establishing European regulation can be too slow or even unfeasible. Take for example the legal and political limitations of the EU competences or the time-intensive negotiations between member states and institutions.

To counter these limitations and secure a leading position, member states often decide to unilaterally develop national regulation instead of waiting for a comprehensive European framework. In effect, they may inspire other EU member states and countries outside the block to also follow a national approach (see examples below). This evolving process, in which an EU member state decides to regulate a certain policy area on the national level and inspire other regulatory jurisdictions to follow suit, is what I refer to as the ‘the Member State Effect’.

The Member State Effect in practice

Two examples of the Member State Effect can be found in the areas of mandatory corporate due diligence and (green) hydrogen. In the case of due diligence, France created momentum across Europe by adopting the ‘Loi de Vigilance’ in 2017, which requires all large French companies to draw up and publish a due diligence plan to prevent human rights violations and damages to the environment in their production chains. Recently, Germany decided to follow France’s example by implementing the ‘Supply Chain Due Diligence Act’ and the Netherlands and Denmark are considering to also take a national approach if the EU-track progresses insufficiently in the months to come. In 2020 the European Commission announced to develop a legislative initiative on human rights and environmental due diligence obligations for EU companies but failed to deliver on their initial deadline of early 2021.

In the case of hydrogen, a similar policy development can be observed, although the process is in an earlier stage. Member states are calling upon the European Commission to come up with a regulatory framework for hydrogen while they are speeding up their national plans for a hydrogen economy. For example, Germany launched the H2 Global initiative to build an international market for green hydrogen with an investment of €900 million and France announced to invest in two large green hydrogen production facilities as part of their €30 billion plan to “re-industrialise” the country. Countries like the Netherlands are following these announcements with great interest and it serves – at least – as a form of inspiration to also develop national (supportive) policies and not fall behind. Looking at the policy challenges and divergent (geopolitical) interests of member states in the area of hydrogen, it seems likely that more member states will decide to take a national approach and not await comprehensive and harmonized European regulation.

Consequences for the regulatory landscape

The decision of a member state to choose national regulation over EU regulation can have various justifiable reasons. However, it leads to greater fragmentation of the European regulatory landscape and reduces the chances of effective EU policy since multiple member states have already introduced their own (except if one member state’s policy has been leading in the drafting of the other national policies). This is worrisome because tackling climate change and enhancing the free movement of goods and services call for an internationally coordinated and comprehensive approach from governments.

Ambitious policy measures like the Fit for 55 package* can counter the policy fragmentation and put the EU back in the driver’s seat. It harmonizes a large number of existing regulations and contain a much needed catch-up in the field of sustainable technologies. In the upcoming period, it will be interesting to see to which extent the EU is able to push through European-wide initiatives like the Fit for 55 package as a better alternative to national policy initiatives.

Influence and manage the Member State Effect

The Member State Effect shows that international companies and NGOs should not only pay attention to the EU dimension but also to progressive countries. Being aware of the policy developments on both level allows you to manage and influence policy fragmentation by engaging with policy makers in a country that considers to introduce national policy.

*Package of proposals to make the EU’s climate, energy, land use, transport and taxation policies fit for reducing net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030.

Photo “European Union Flags 2” by Thijs ter Haar

''The Member State Effect shows that international companies and NGOs should not only pay attention to the EU dimension but also to progressive countries''

Lieuwe Burger

Director

+31 (0)70 304 6499

lburger@publicmatters.eu

Read more:

Marloes Telgenhof joins Public Matters Team as Senior Director
28 Jun 2022
Uitgelicht
News
Nitrogen crisis puts provinces on the map of lobbyists
22 Jun 2022
News
The patient’s voice in the healthcare debate
16 Jun 2022
News
Public Matters celebrates 20th anniversary in Nieuwspoort
13 May 2022
News
New talents join Team Public Matters
07 Apr 2022
News

  • Ruim drie maanden na de #gemeenteraadsverkiezingen is er in bijna 14 procent van de gemeenten nog geen nieuw college. De formatie gaat daarmee aanzienlijk trager dan vier jaar geleden https://t.co/Bwmy677zEh #GR2022

    2022-07-04 10:21:14




  • Wie de afgelopen weken een blik wierp op de parlementaire commissieagenda’s, zal iets nieuws zijn opgevallen: de strategische #procedurevergadering. Dit volgt uit het advies van de Werkgroep Van Der Staaij. Wat dit precies inhoudt, lees je hier 👇 https://t.co/WgQzUMYbZe

    2022-06-29 11:39:38




  • Per 1 juli 2022 start Marloes Telgenhof als Senior Director bij Public Matters. Met haar uitgebreide ervaring bij zowel de overheid als het bedrijfsleven is Marloes een welkome versterking van het Public Matters Team! https://t.co/fFpdO5NG1h #werkenbijPM

    2022-06-28 10:36:33




  • Gisteren spraken we in het PM-webinar met @ErikHaverkort en @BroekhofMartijn over de routekaart om van Nederland koploper te maken in duurzame industrie. Het was een interessante en interactieve discussie! Terugkijken kan via 👉 https://t.co/FCOXyCdRjl #PMwebinar https://t.co/ZOUig19WQO

    2022-06-24 17:06:23




  • Een nieuwe wet moet zorgen voor een betere controle op de politieke geldstromen. ‘Geld is te belangrijk geworden in de politiek’, aldus toezichthouder partijfinanciën @edanker in @FTM_nl https://t.co/bbx96oFEaW

    2022-06-24 10:00:13




  • De komende tijd zal veel aandacht uitgaan naar de #boerenprotesten en debat in de #TweedeKamer over de #stikstofcrisis. Maar de strijd zal pas echt beslecht worden in de #provincie, waar vergaand beleid moet worden ontwikkeld: https://t.co/zkZbeX7Z9Z #stikstof

    2022-06-22 09:34:03




  • Vergeet je niet aan te melden voor ons #webinar aanstaande donderdag! Naast @VVD-Kamerlid @erikhaverkort zal ook @BroekhofMartijn van @VNCI aanwezig zijn en in gesprek gaan over de verduurzaming van de industrie👇✅ https://t.co/ocYSWT4T8R

    2022-06-21 14:17:23




  • Luister naar de nieuwe aflevering van onze #pmpodcast ‘In de Lobby’: deze keer over hoe je je invloed in Brussel kunt vergroten, het nut van BNC-fiches en het zoeken naar dubbele spaties 👇 https://t.co/Art8JcfMet #IndeLobby #podcast #lobby #publicaffairs #Brussel https://t.co/OZ6fWbTonX

    2022-06-20 17:07:04




  • In weer een nieuwe aflevering van onze #pmpodcast ‘In de Lobby’ gaat @EULobby in gesprek met @Mendeltje – praktijkprofessor en EU-expert. Luisteren!👇 https://t.co/Art8JcfMet #podcast #Brussel https://t.co/v87Eskr0uM

    2022-06-20 10:42:33




  • De afgelopen weken stonden in de #TweedeKamer in het teken van de #zorg met verstrekkende gevolgen voor #industrie en #patiënt. Toch lijkt de aandacht van de Kamer te verslappen, lees meer hierover via 👇 https://t.co/wW76Q04rmK

    2022-06-16 16:51:36




Public Matters is a leading public affairs & lobby consultancy in the Netherlands and Brussels supporting organisations that seek to influence policy and engage in strategic communications.

Office The Hague
Bezuidenhoutseweg 101
2594 AC Den Haag
+31 (0)70 3046 499

Office Brussels
Avenue des Arts 39
B-1040 Brussel
+ 32 (0)2 502 77 71

Social media

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

info@publicmatters.nl

Podcast ‘In the lobby’: Lobby developments & trends in Washington... UPDATE DUTCH POLITICS: a new Coalition Agreement – finally!
Scroll to top